Listen to this post

Most construction contracts include a provision stating that the contractor or subcontractor is an independent contractor and not an employee of the owner or contractor. That should settle the matter, right? Wrong. Depending on the context and jurisdiction, such contractual provisions may mean little or nothing at all.

Check State Laws

In 2024, the Minnesota Legislature passed a law that contains 14 mandatory requirements for a construction contractor to qualify as an independent contractor under the state labor laws. Among other requirements, the contractor must:

  • Have federal and state tax ID numbers;
  • Receive and retain Form 1099s;
  • Have certain types of unemployment and workers’ compensation insurance;
  • Have control over the means of performing the work;
  • Have a written contract that is fully executed no later than 30 days after work commences; and
  • Submit written invoices. 

Contractors in Minnesota who do not satisfy all these and other requirements are considered employees. The state may assess fines of up to $10,000 per violation against those who misclassify their contractors and subcontractors as independent contractors.

In Minnesota ABC v. Blissenbach, the Minnesota Chapter of the Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) challenged the new law in federal court arguing that it was unconstitutional. ABC alleged several common practices that the law arguably proscribes, including not executing written subcontracts within 30 days of beginning work and paying subcontractors without receiving an invoice. The district court rejected ABC’s constitutional challenge, and just last week, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. The Eighth Circuit held that the law was not unconstitutionally vague and did not violate the Excessive Fines Clause of the U.S. Constitution. As a result, the law remains in effect and may be enforced by the Minnesota Department of Labor and attorney general.

Takeaways

The Blissenbach decision is a good reminder to consult state law regarding the classification of independent contractors for purposes of complying with state employment laws. As a full-service law firm with lawyers licensed in almost every state, Bradley has labor and employment and construction lawyers who are ready and willing to assist.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of John Mark Goodman John Mark Goodman

John Mark Goodman has been with Bradley his entire legal career as a member of Bradley’s Litigation and Construction practice groups. He has an engineering degree from Georgia Tech and a law degree from Virginia. John Mark has had the privilege of representing…

John Mark Goodman has been with Bradley his entire legal career as a member of Bradley’s Litigation and Construction practice groups. He has an engineering degree from Georgia Tech and a law degree from Virginia. John Mark has had the privilege of representing clients throughout the U.S. and abroad in a wide variety of litigation and arbitration matters, including construction disputes, products liability claims, tax appeals, breach of contract/warranty, patent disputes, trade secret theft, and general commercial litigation.

Photo of Anne R. Yuengert Anne R. Yuengert

Anne Yuengert works with clients to manage their employees, including conducting workplace investigations of harassment or theft, training employees and supervisors, consulting on reductions in force and severance agreements, drafting employment agreements (including enforceable noncompetes) and handbooks, assessing reasonable accommodations for disabilities, and…

Anne Yuengert works with clients to manage their employees, including conducting workplace investigations of harassment or theft, training employees and supervisors, consulting on reductions in force and severance agreements, drafting employment agreements (including enforceable noncompetes) and handbooks, assessing reasonable accommodations for disabilities, and working through issues surrounding FMLA and USERRA leave. When preventive measures are not enough, she handles EEOC charges, OFCCP and DOL complaints and investigations, and has handled cases before arbitrators, administrative law judges and federal and state court judges. She has tried more than 30 cases to verdict.