OSHA’s COVID-19 Enforcement Updates: Case Response Plan and Employer Recordkeeping GuidanceOn May 19, 2020, OSHA issued an Updated Interim Enforcement Response Plan for Coronavirus Disease to address how the administration intends to handle COVID-19 related complaints, referrals and reports. At the same time, OSHA also issued Revised Enforcement Guidance for Recording COVID-19 Cases. Both the plan and the updated guidance go into effect on May 26, 2020.

Bradley discussed the terms of the OSHA’s original COVID-19 guidance in an early post, which can be found here.

Updated Enforcement Plan

Under the plan, OSHA will adopt enforcement response measures that differ based on whether “community spread of COVID-19 has significantly decreased” or whether a given geographic area continues to experience “sustained elevated community transmission or a resurgence” of COVID-19 transmission.

In areas where the spread of the virus has decreased, OSHA will resume its inspection planning policy set forth in Chapter 2 of the OSHA Field Operations Manual, CPL 02-00-164, with the exception that OSHA will continue to prioritize COVID-19 cases, utilize non-formal phone and fax investigations or rapid response investigations as needed to efficiently use its resources, and each OSHA area director will ensure that compliance safety and health officers use appropriate precautions and PPE during inspections.

In areas with continued high levels of virus transmission, OSHA will prioritize COVID-19 fatalities and “imminent danger exposures.” When resources are insufficient for onsite inspections, inspections will commence remotely with the expectation that an onsite inspection will follow at a later date. If resources are so limited that neither onsite nor remote inspections are possible, OSHA will conduct its investigations using a rapid response investigation “to identify hazards, provide abatement assistance, and confirm abatement.” In communities with a high prevalence of COVID-19 transmission, special attention to onsite inspections will be given to high-exposure risk work environments such as healthcare facilities, biomedical laboratories, funeral homes and crematoriums, and medical transport companies.

Revised Recordkeeping Enforcement Guidance

Because “outbreaks among workers in industries other than healthcare, emergency response, or correctional institutions have been identified,” OSHA expects employers to take action to determine whether workers’ illnesses are work related. Under OSHA’s recordkeeping requirements, a COVID-19 case is recordable if it (1) is confirmed to be COVID-19 as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; (2) is work related under 29 CFR § 1904.5; and (3) involves one or more of the general recording criteria set forth in 29 CFR § 1904.7.

The updated guidance continues to recognize the difficulty in determining whether a COVID-19 case is work related and grants enforcement discretion to compliance safety and health officers to assess employers’ efforts in making work-related determinations. Specifically, OSHA officers are instructed to assess the reasonableness of the employer’s investigation into work-relatedness, the evidence available to the employer, and the evidence that a COVID-19 illness was contracted at work.

Employers are not expected to undertake extensive medical inquiries into an employee’s case but can satisfy the requirement to conduct a reasonable investigation by asking the employee how he or she believes the illness was contracted, discussing the employee’s work and out-of-work activities that may have led to the illness, and reviewing the employee’s work environment for potential circumstances of exposure.

If after conducting a reasonable, good faith investigation and weighing all reasonably available evidence “the employer cannot determine whether it is more likely than not that exposure in the workplace played a causal role” in the particular case, then the employer is not required to record the COVID-19 illness. However, in all cases, OSHA cautions that employers should examine COVID-19 cases among workers and respond appropriately to safeguard the health and safety of employees.

If you have any questions about OSHA’s updates to its enforcement plan or COVID-19 recordkeeping requirements, please contact Alex Thrasher, Chris Selman, or John Hargrove.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Alexander G. Thrasher Alexander G. Thrasher

Alex Thrasher is a litigator in the Construction Practice Group who represents clients in complex construction-related matters. He is adept at managing cases throughout all phases of litigation to advance his clients’ interests and has tried numerous cases through final verdict or award.

Alex Thrasher is a litigator in the Construction Practice Group who represents clients in complex construction-related matters. He is adept at managing cases throughout all phases of litigation to advance his clients’ interests and has tried numerous cases through final verdict or award. Prior to practicing law, Alex was a project manager for an industrial contractor where he worked on projects in the power generation, water and wastewater, oil and gas, and pulp and paper industries throughout the Southeast.

Photo of J. Christopher Selman J. Christopher Selman

Christopher Selman is a litigator, representing clients in a variety of industries, such as construction, government contracting, energy, and real estate.

Christopher’s construction practice involves the representation of owners, EPC contractors, general contractors, subcontractors and suppliers in a variety of issues and projects…

Christopher Selman is a litigator, representing clients in a variety of industries, such as construction, government contracting, energy, and real estate.

Christopher’s construction practice involves the representation of owners, EPC contractors, general contractors, subcontractors and suppliers in a variety of issues and projects, both public and private. Christopher has experience managing construction disputes across the United States and abroad, including Alabama, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, the Republic of Panama, Turkey, and the Dominican Republic.

Photo of John W. Hargrove John W. Hargrove

John Hargrove is a partner in the Labor and Employment Practice Group where he has practiced for almost 40 years. He also is a Fellow in the American College of Labor and Employment Lawyers. He regularly represents public and private companies in mining…

John Hargrove is a partner in the Labor and Employment Practice Group where he has practiced for almost 40 years. He also is a Fellow in the American College of Labor and Employment Lawyers. He regularly represents public and private companies in mining, construction, manufacturing, medical, communications and warehousing industries, among others. He also represents municipal and quasi-public organizations such as police and fire departments and school boards. John also has represented several nonprofit agencies, ranging from national sports organizations to small local charities.