Colleges and universities are increasingly engaged in complex relationships with the federal government — through contracts, cooperative agreements, and research grants that fund everything from infrastructure and cybersecurity to medical and defense-related innovations. With billions of dollars in federal funding flowing annually to higher education institutions, compliance with government contracting and grant requirements is not only a legal obligation, it’s a critical safeguard for institutional integrity, reputation, and continued eligibility for federal funding.

The Expanding Federal Footprint in Higher Education

Federal funding for research and development at colleges and universities has steadily increased over the past decade. Agencies such as the Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Energy (DOE), National Science Foundation (NSF), and National Institutes of Health (NIH) rely on universities to carry out vital research. In many cases, the lines between “grant” and “contract” activity have blurred, with universities performing work that falls squarely under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) — which, incidentally, is currently undergoing a complete overhaul — or agency-specific supplements (e.g., DFARS, DEAR).

At the same time, universities are generally subject to the Uniform Guidance (2 C.F.R. Part 200), which imposes stringent cost, administrative, and audit requirements on certain federal awards. Noncompliance — whether intentional or inadvertent — can lead to costly enforcement actions, reputational harm, and, in severe cases, suspension or debarment from federal programs.

Why Compliance Matters

• Enforcement Is Increasing – Federal agencies and inspectors general have stepped up oversight of higher education institutions’ compliance with procurement, cost accounting, and cybersecurity obligations. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has also applied the False Claims Act (FCA) aggressively in the university context, alleging that institutions submitted false certifications or mischarged costs to federal awards.
• Cybersecurity and Data Protection – Many research universities handle controlled unclassified information (CUI) and are therefore subject to cybersecurity standards under DFARS 252.204-7012 and NIST SP 800-171. Failing to meet these requirements can trigger contractual noncompliance, FCA exposure, or loss of eligibility for defense-related research funding.
• Cost and Accounting Rules – Under both the FAR and Uniform Guidance, universities must maintain adequate internal controls and accounting systems to ensure allowability, allocability, and reasonableness of costs. Improper cost transfers, inadequate documentation, or unapproved indirect cost rates can all lead to audit findings or financial penalties.
• Human Subjects, Export Controls, and IP Compliance – Beyond fiscal rules, universities must comply with statutes governing human subjects research (Common Rule), export control laws (ITAR/EAR), and intellectual property rights under the Bayh–Dole Act. Each area carries unique compliance obligations and potential liability.

Practical Steps for Institutional Compliance

• Establish a Centralized Compliance Framework – Develop a cross-functional compliance structure involving research administration, sponsored programs, procurement, legal counsel, and internal audit.
• Implement Robust Policies and Training – Regular training for faculty and administrators on key federal requirements — particularly cost allowability, time and effort reporting, and data security — is essential.
• Conduct Regular Internal Audits – Periodic self-assessments and mock audits can identify compliance gaps before federal auditors do.
• Document, Document, Document – Federal compliance turns heavily on documentation. Institutions should maintain contemporaneous records of cost decisions, subrecipient monitoring, and contract performance.
• Respond Promptly to Issues – If potential noncompliance arises, universities should consult with experienced legal counsel, promptly investigate, disclose as appropriate, and remediate to demonstrate good-faith compliance efforts.

The Bottom Line

Federal contracting and grant compliance is no longer an administrative formality for colleges and universities — it is a strategic imperative. The growing complexity of federal requirements, coupled with heightened enforcement, makes proactive compliance not just advisable, but essential. Universities and colleges that invest in strong compliance infrastructure, culture, and oversight position themselves to continue advancing their research missions while minimizing legal, reputational, and financial risk.

Bradley’s nationally ranked Government Contracts Practice Group routinely represents colleges and universities in connection with federal contracting and grant matters. Accordingly, if you have any questions about any of the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact Aron Beezley, Nathaniel Greeson, or Eugene Benick.